You should limit your total upload in Transmission to less than your total available bandwidth.
Since BT clients in general use lots of TCP connections, virtually nothin else gets anything from the available bandwidth, so lots of BT tcp uploads which are not speed limited to less than the available ...
Search found 6 matches
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:10 am
- Forum: Mac Support
- Topic: Transmission halts internet traffic in other applications
- Replies: 8
- Views: 6903
- Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:49 am
- Forum: Mac Requests
- Topic: Inspector Peers: Addresses column way too narrow
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2562
Inspector Peers: Addresses column way too narrow
In the Peers list in the Inspector window the column for IP address is way too narrow for IPv6 addresses.
Please increase the max width of this column to thrize the current max or don't max it for anyone who
wishes to have lots of empty space or uses different system fonts (accessability).
Jor
Please increase the max width of this column to thrize the current max or don't max it for anyone who
wishes to have lots of empty space or uses different system fonts (accessability).
Jor
- Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:52 am
- Forum: Requests
- Topic: Prefer uploaders
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3939
Re: Prefer uploaders
I second this proposal.
However, peers without much data should not be discriminated, so i have following additions to this suggestion:
- don't modulate upload to peers that have less than $USERADJUSTABLE Percentage of data, regardless if they choke us.
- prefer upload to peers who are not chocked ...
However, peers without much data should not be discriminated, so i have following additions to this suggestion:
- don't modulate upload to peers that have less than $USERADJUSTABLE Percentage of data, regardless if they choke us.
- prefer upload to peers who are not chocked ...
- Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:06 pm
- Forum: Support
- Topic: "Address family not supported by protocol family" errors?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11529
Re: "Address family not supported by protocol family" errors?
[Edit:] apparently i was wrong. The code in peer-mgr.c does not cause the error, although it should use ntoh-macros.
I guess there are more than one host-byte-order/network-byte-order issues buried in the transmission source code.
I guess there are more than one host-byte-order/network-byte-order issues buried in the transmission source code.
- Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:19 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: Cannot connect to socket #foo to x.x.x.x
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7088
Re: Cannot connect to socket #foo to x.x.x.x
See the other thread about this problem (net unreachable):
http://forum.transmissionbt.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6758
The error-text indicates that you are not using the Mac OS X version but Linux, right?
Darwin kernel refuses the connects to Multicast IPs with "protocol not supported" (EPROTOTYPE in ...
http://forum.transmissionbt.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6758
The error-text indicates that you are not using the Mac OS X version but Linux, right?
Darwin kernel refuses the connects to Multicast IPs with "protocol not supported" (EPROTOTYPE in ...
- Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:21 am
- Forum: Support
- Topic: "Address family not supported by protocol family" errors?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11529
Re: Help: How to solve these errors??
I've seen the same Errors in my log (Transmission 1.40, haven't upgraded yet).
The reason why those connects fail ist: any IPv4 address with the first byte between 224 and 240 is a Multicast Address.
A TCP unicast client simply cannot connect to such a bogus IP address.
I do not know why ...
The reason why those connects fail ist: any IPv4 address with the first byte between 224 and 240 is a Multicast Address.
A TCP unicast client simply cannot connect to such a bogus IP address.
I do not know why ...