Of course and I understand this perfectly; what I just wanted to express is that's quite normal some users may switch to other softs if after many, many revisions, some serious prolems are still unfixed (since 1.51 I have these issues, whatever is the problem, it's not normal). I know this feedback seems useless, but in fact if these problems are unfixed (again tested last stable on a clean config) perhaps you dev guys need some reminder that other softs are growing well lately and you may definitively lose users if things stay unchanged.livings124 wrote:Cordieri: If you can't read a few posts back, then that's not my problem.
Well without being rude, if (again) after MANY revisions and lot of feedback on this board, the problem is still here, one can easily wonder if as you say "they are already trying the best they can", don't you think?essiw wrote:lol, they do this for free you know. and if it is 27 pages long doesn't that mean that this is a huge problem and they are already trying the best they can? you Cordieri should show some respect to them, instead of saying that they could have fixed it already, if it is that simple why don't you fix it yourself? it is open source.
Now, for the info, I post/react upon the disrespectful answer of a dev to some feedback I could have done myself. So now that I gave you all the keys to decode the why of my post, I guess you can now completely understand it.

Sorry for bothering, end of the trolling. I'll come back around 1.9 I guess...